Kinh Nghiệm Hướng dẫn Which of the following statements about opinion writing the supreme court is true? Mới Nhất
Dương Văn Hà đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Which of the following statements about opinion writing the supreme court is true? được Update vào lúc : 2022-11-10 19:20:11 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Kinh Nghiệm về trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết Mới Nhất. Nếu sau khi đọc nội dung bài viết vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.The Supreme Court shall be composed of a Chief Justice and fourteen Associate Justices. It may sit en banc or, in its discretion, in divisions of three, five, or seven members. (Art. VIII, §4) Its members shall be appointed by the President from a list of least three nominees prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy, without need of confirmation by the Commission on Appointments. (Art. VIII, §9) Members of the Supreme Court are required to have proven competence, integrity, probity and independence; they must be natural-born citizens of the Philippines, least forty years old, with least fifteen years of experience as a judge of a lower court or law practice in the country. (Art. VIII, §7) Justices shall hold office during good behavior until they reach the age of seventy years, or become incapacitated to discharge the duties of office. (Art. VIII, §11)
Nội dung chính Show- What happens during the writing of a Supreme Court opinion quizlet?Which of the following statements is true about the number of Supreme Court justices quizlet?Which of the following is true of the United States Supreme Court quizlet?In which of the following areas can the Supreme Court use judicial review quizlet?
THE MEMBERS OF THE COURT
The Chief
Justice
Hon. ALEXANDER G. GESMUNDO
The Senior Associate Justice
Hon. MARVIC MARIO VICTOR F. LEONEN
The Associate Justices
Hon. ALFREDO BENJAMIN S. CAGUIOA
Hon. RAMON PAUL L. HERNANDO
Hon. AMY C. LAZARO-JAVIER
Hon. HENRI JEAN PAUL B. INTING
Hon. RODIL V. ZALAMEDA
Hon. MARIO V. LOPEZ
Hon. SAMUEL H. GAERLAN
Hon. RICARDO R. ROSARIO
Hon. JHOSEP Y. LOPEZ
Hon. JAPAR B. DIMAAMPAO
Hon. JOSE MIDAS P.
MARQUEZ
Hon. ANTONIO T. KHO, JR.
Hon. MARIA FILOMENA D. SINGH
Administrative Officers
Clerk of Court En Banc
Atty. Marife M. Lomibao-Cuevas
Deputy Clerk of Court En Banc
Atty. Anna-Li R. Papa-Gombio
First Division Clerk of Court
Atty. Librada C. Buena
Second Division Clerk of Court
Atty. Teresita A. Tuazon
Third Division Clerk of
Court
Atty. Misael Domingo C. Battung III
Public Information Office
Atty. Brian Keith Hosaka, Assistant Court Administrator and Chief
Fiscal Management and Budget Office
Atty. Corazon G. Ferrer-Flores, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief of Office
Office of Administrative Services
Atty. Maria Carina M. Cunanan, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief Administrative Officer
Chief
Attorney
Atty. Maria Victoria Gleoresty Sp. Guerra, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief Attorney
Office of the Reporter
Atty. Annaliza Ty-Capacite, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief of Office
Judicial Records Office
Atty. Basilia T. Ringol, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief of Office
Program Management Office
Atty. Laura C.H. Del Rosario, Deputy Clerk of Court and Judicial Reform
Program Administrator
Bar Confidant
Atty. Amor P. Entila, Assistant Bar Confidant
Management Information Systems Office
Atty. Jed Sherwin G. Uy, Deputy Clerk of Court and Chief Technology Officer
Medical Services
Dr. Prudencio P. Banzon, Jr., Chief
Printing Services
Mr. Ponciano M. Santiago, Jr., Chief Judicial Staff Officer
Library
Services
Atty. Joyce Jazmin G. Dimaisip-Cunanan, Acting SC Senior Chief Staff Officer
Judicial Power and Jurisdiction
Under Article VIII, §1, the judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be provided by law. This power includes the duty to settle actual controversies involving rights that are legally demandable and enforceable and to determine if any branch or instrumentality of government has acted
with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of excess of jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. It exercises original jurisdiction (cases are directly filed with the SC in the first instance without passing through any of the lower courts) over cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and over petitions for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus. (Art. VIII, §5(1)). It also has original
jurisdiction over writs of amparo, habeas data and the environmental writ of kalikasan. It exercises appellate jurisdiction to review, revise, reverse, modify, or affirm final judgments, and orders of the lower courts in:
(a) All cases in which the constitutionality or validity of any treaty, international or executive agreement, law, presidential decree, proclamation, order, instruction, ordinance, or regulation is in question.
(b) All cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll, or any penalty imposed in relation thereto.
(c) All cases in which the jurisdiction of any lower court is in issue.
(d) All criminal cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or higher.
(e) All cases in which only an error or question of law is involved. (Art. VIII, §5(1), (2))
The Supreme Court has administrative supervision over all courts and court personnel. (Article VIII, §6) It exercises this power through the Office of the Court Administrator.
Rule-making Powers
The Supreme Court has the exclusive power to promulgate rules concerning the protection and enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts, the admission to the practice of law, the integrated bar, and legal assistance to the underprivileged. Any such rules shall provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases, shall be uniform for all courts of the same grade, and shall not diminish, increase, or modify substantive rights. Rules of procedure of special courts and quasi-judicial bodies shall remain effective unless disapproved by the Supreme Court. (Art. VIII, §54(5))