Thủ Thuật về The primary difference between a rubric and a checklist as an evaluation tool is that: Chi Tiết
Hoàng Hải Minh đang tìm kiếm từ khóa The primary difference between a rubric and a checklist as an evaluation tool is that: được Update vào lúc : 2022-11-07 13:02:03 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Kinh Nghiệm Hướng dẫn trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi đọc tài liệu vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Admin lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.4.1 Acquiring and maintaining a repertoire of evaluation tools and techniques
Nội dung chính Show- Additional Online Resources for ChecklistsRating ScaleAdditional Online Resources for RubricsPeer & Self-AssessmentAdditional
Online Resources for Peer & Self AssessmentThe anatomy of a rubricDeveloping a rubricRating ScalesWhat is the difference between a checklist and a rubric?What is a rubric or checklist used for in writing?What is checklist as a tool of assessment?What is a checklist used for in the classroom?
There are many tools to choose from for assessing student evaluation. Tools include: (but are not limited to) checklists, rating scales, rubrics, portfolios, exams and peer evaluations. An assessment tool has to be proficient as it is information for educators and learners alike in order to clearly indicate the criteria against which the learning will be assessed.
Checklist
A checklist is the least complex form of scoring that examines the presence or absence of specific elements in the product of a performance. All elements are generally weighted the same and the gradations in quality are typically not recognized.
- Checklist for Journal ResponsesJournal Reflection Checklist
Additional Online Resources for Checklists
Please see the following resources for information on creating checklists for your face-to-face, hybrid and online learning environment:
- Choosing
Performance Assessement Tasks: ChecklistDeveloping Checklists and Rating Scales
Rating Scale
A rating scale incorporates quality to the ‘elements’ in the process or product which can be numeric or descriptive. Unlike checklists, rating scales allow for attaching quality to ‘elements’ in the process or product.
Rubrics
A rubric is a chart or matrix which includes indicators that describe different levels of achievement for the major components or ‘elements’ of a performance. A typical rubric contains a scale with a range of possible points for assessing work. Usually high numbers are associated with strong student performance and low numbers with poor student performance. Rubrics also use descriptors to assess student mastery and performance levels. The following list of templates will help get you started.
- Collaboration Group Presentation TemplateDiscussion Board Activity TemplateDiscussion Board Forum
TemplateGroup Presentation TemplateICE Assessment Template for EssaysOral Presentation TemplateResearch Paper TemplateScientific Report Template
Additional Online Resources for Rubrics
Please see the following resources for information on creating rubrics for your face-to-face, hybrid and online learning environment:
- A Review of Rubric use in Higher EducationExploring the Advantages of RubricsRubrics: An
Undervalued Teaching ToolRubrics for TeachersRubric GalleryRubistarShould you be Using Rubrics?TeAchnologyWhat are Rubrics?
Peer & Self-Assessment
Peer & Self- Assessment helps students reflect on their learning throughout the course of an academic term or year, giving them the opportunity to measure their performance and skill level. Self- Assessment is used for reflection and documentation of the learner’s growth. The following is a list of self assessment resources that can be modified and adapted for your own use.
- Group Presentation Self AssessmentSelf Assessment Reflection
Additional Online Resources for Peer & Self Assessment
Please see the following resources for information on creating peer & self assessment reflection tools for your face-to-face, hybrid and online learning environment:
- Characteristics of Effective Assessment Self EvaluationDeveloping Student’s Self-Assessment SkillsFeedback Forms for Peer Assessment in GroupsPeer Critique: Two Strategies for Getting Students to Give FeedbackPersonal Goals: An Exercise in Student Self-AssessmentSelf and Peer Assessment Advantages and Disadvantages
Rubrics
A rubric is an assessment tool that outlines and defines the criteria by which a student’s submission will be evaluated and describes the difference between exemplary and weaker work (Lombardi, 2008).
Why should you use a rubric? A rubric not only shows students what they need to do to be successful in an assessment, but rubrics also present a means of evaluation that reduces subjective grading by providing specific and detailed criteria. By presenting a detailed and consistent breakdown of what is expected various levels of performance, educators are able to examine each assessment through the same lens and mark consistently.
Successful implementation of a rubric relies on it being:
- specific and detailed, but offers some flexibility for creative assessmentsissued to students the same time as the assessment/assignment instructionsreviewed and revised (as needed) with the students
before it is used, and then following use – you will often find gaps the first few times you use a rubric.
There are 2 types of rubrics, and the type selected will be dependent on the assessment you are developing it for:
Holistic: Provides an overall snapshot of progress or achievement. They share feedback on where a student is currently situated relative to an outcome without getting into granular detail, and provide them with a benchmark to work toward in improving their performance. These rubrics are ideal for formative feedback on initial submissions, draft assignments, and assessments where the overall performance is being evaluated.
Analytic: Provides specific numerical (grade) allocation on predetermined ‘parts’ of an assessment. These are generally grids that specify levels of achievement, aligned with categories and descriptions of requirements.
Most LMS have an integrated rubric tool that supports development of both holistic and analytic rubrics that can be linked directly to the assignment and the gradebook. If the LMS you are working with does not, you can use online tools such as ForAllRubrics or Rubistar, or software such as Word or Excel (convert to a PDF prior to distribution to students).
The anatomy of a rubric
There are 4 key components to any rubric:
CriteriaCriteria standardPerformance levelsPerformance descriptorClick on the “+” icons next to each number for a description of each component.
Download a printable/accessible version of this sample rubric [PDF].
Developing a rubric
In the interactive element below, use the menu bar (☰) on the left or the arrows on the right to view the content on all 7 pages.
Checklists
Source: “Check list hand pen business” by Tumisu from PixabayIn some instances, rubrics may not be the ideal evaluation tool. Some assessments require a “did” or “did not”, complete or incomplete approach. In these cases, a checklist can not only be useful in supporting objective evaluation, but can also provide students with the specific assessment elements or tasks you are looking for – very much like a rubric. A checklist is the simplest way to determine the presence or absence of any component of a given assessment.
Verbiage for checklists may include:
- Complete and incompleteYes and noPresent and absentAcceptable and unacceptable
Checklists are best used in formative assessments to provide students with an overview of how they are progressing towards a goal, but can also be valuable in summative assessments, particularly when a set of skills is being demonstrated or inclusions (in a report, for example) are being considered. As with rubrics, checklists should be provided to, and discussed with, the students the same time as the assessment instructions, and should be reviewed and revised each time it is used.
Rating Scales
Rating scales combine the simplicity of a checklist with the more specific level of achievement of a rubric. A rating scale indicates how well a student performed on a specific element of an assessment or task, based on expected outcomes, but lacks the granularity of performance descriptors. As such, rating scales are an excellent tool for self-assessment, diagnostic or formative assessments, and even peer feedback.
This evaluation tool is also set up in a grid, or matrix, similar to a rubric, with both criteria (performance area, skill, component) and performance levels. Performance levels in a rating scale may or may not have associated points, and may be more subjective in nature, such as:
Credit: Durham College Centre for Teaching and LearningPerformance levels range from favourable to unfavourable, left to right.
Example 1: Strongly agree; Agree; Slightly agree; Slightly disagree; Disagree; Strongly disagree
Example 2: Excellent; Good; Satisfactory; Weak; Poor
Example 3: Exceeds expectations; Meets expectations; Approaching expectations; Below expectations;
Absent/incomplete
Exemplars
Whenever possible, presenting students with an example of the assessment allows them to understand what you are expecting and provides inspiration as they embark on the task.
Source: “Woman working home using her máy tính” by Vlada Karpovich from PexelsExemplars can be:
- Created by you to show your expectations and what your approach would be, orAn artifact (sample) of work submitted by students in the
past to demonstrate variety and different levels of performance.
Exemplars inspire performance and creativity, so be sure to let students know when they are không lấy phí to make creative choices.
Consider an assessment you are planning, or have already administered, and develop a rubric, checklist, or rating scale using either a simple chart format or an online development tool. Share the assessment directions and evaluation tool with a colleague for feedback, checking specifically if the tool appropriately outlines the performance requirements for the assessment and supports student success.